From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-26961-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15426 invoked by alias); 1 Jan 2003 12:26:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15412 invoked by uid 71); 1 Jan 2003 12:26:02 -0000
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 12:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030101122602.15411.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
Subject: Re: c++/8982: "using foo::operator+" doesn't parse
Reply-To: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/8982; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
To: dean@foster.net, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
   nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/8982: "using foo::operator+" doesn't parse
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 07:21:25 -0500

 This appears to work with mainline now that the new parser has been committed.
 
 Does this nead a testcase (and if so where should I put it)?  Once that 
 question is resolved I believe we can close this bug.