From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20959 invoked by alias); 1 Jan 2003 18:46:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20943 invoked by uid 71); 1 Jan 2003 18:46:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 18:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030101184601.20942.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Christian Ehrhardt" Subject: Re: c++/50: problem calling destructor on typedef of int within namespace Reply-To: "Christian Ehrhardt" X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00045.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/50; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Christian Ehrhardt" To: neil@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, martin@loewis.home.cs.tu-berlin.de, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, paul.thomas@eds.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: c++/50: problem calling destructor on typedef of int within namespace Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 19:42:21 +0100 On Wed, Jan 01, 2003 at 12:17:02AM -0000, neil@gcc.gnu.org wrote: > Synopsis: problem calling destructor on typedef of int within namespace > > State-Changed-From-To: suspended->closed > State-Changed-By: neil > State-Changed-When: Tue Dec 31 16:17:01 2002 > State-Changed-Why: > Fixed for 3.4. Hm, there are two code snippets in that report, one indeed compiles for me, the other one gives an ICE now. See PR 9099 for a reduced example but shouldn't we keep the report open until we can verify that both code snippets compile? regards Christian -- THAT'S ALL FOLKS!