From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-27038-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16441 invoked by alias); 1 Jan 2003 21:36:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16427 invoked by uid 71); 1 Jan 2003 21:36:01 -0000
Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2003 21:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030101213601.16426.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
Subject: Re: optimization/5200: Store Motion is broken
Reply-To: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/5200; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, aj@suse.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
   nobody@gcc.gnu.org, jakub@redhat.com, rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/5200: Store Motion is broken
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 16:25:39 -0500

 What's the status of this on mainline?  Did it get fixed?