From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19266 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2003 13:19:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19181 invoked by uid 61); 2 Jan 2003 13:19:25 -0000 Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 13:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030102131925.19171.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de From: paolo@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: paolo@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, schmid@snake.iap.physik.tu-darmstadt.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/9127: Recursive templates don not work on the main line (regression) X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00120.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Recursive templates don not work on the main line (regression) State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: paolo State-Changed-When: Thu Jan 2 05:19:21 2003 State-Changed-Why: Actually, the testcase is illegal, since it misses the template<> introducing template specialization (i.e., template<> struct tento<0> ...). However, the diagnostic message seems at best misleading... (on the correct syntax see the NEWS file and many examples in the new treatise from Vandevoorde and Josuttis) http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9127