From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-27100-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10655 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2003 18:56:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10641 invoked by uid 71); 2 Jan 2003 18:56:00 -0000
Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 18:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030102185600.10640.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
Subject: Re: c++/2121: ...
Reply-To: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00139.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/2121; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
To: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
	neil@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/2121: ...
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 18:52:43 +0000

 Nathanael Nerode wrote:-
 
 > Neil, I know you closed this because it's fixed, but does it have a test case 
 > yet? :-)
 
 It was fixed by the lookup patch, which has half a dozen or so
 testcases.
 
 Neil.