From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6897 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2003 22:46:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6879 invoked by uid 71); 2 Jan 2003 22:46:02 -0000 Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 22:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030102224602.6878.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Janis Johnson Subject: Re: c/7227: [<3.2/3.3> regression]: bogus code generation with attribute mode TI Reply-To: Janis Johnson X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00157.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/7227; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Janis Johnson To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu Cc: Subject: Re: c/7227: [<3.2/3.3> regression]: bogus code generation with attribute mode TI Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 14:41:13 -0800 The warning is issued for the current (20031231) mainline and 3.3 branch compilers for a 32-bit compiler on a powerpc64-linux system, but not for 64-bit cross or native compilers on the same system. It's also not seen for ia64-linux. Why is the class "wrong-code" and the the synopsis "bogus code generation" when in fact it's an incorrect warning, not incorrect code? http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7227