From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7591 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2003 22:47:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7567 invoked by uid 61); 2 Jan 2003 22:47:47 -0000 Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 22:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030102224747.7566.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org, sunil.k.davasam@intel.com From: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org, sunil.k.davasam@intel.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/9076: Call Frame Instructions are not handled correctly during unwind operation.. X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00158.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Call Frame Instructions are not handled correctly during unwind operation.. Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->rth Responsible-Changed-By: bkoz Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Jan 2 14:47:46 2003 Responsible-Changed-Why: Hey Richard can you give me some feedback about this? This bug has a patch enclosed to unwind-dw2.c, and it seems reasonable. Thanks, benjamin State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: bkoz State-Changed-When: Thu Jan 2 14:47:46 2003 State-Changed-Why: Seems reasonable. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9076