From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19977 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2003 23:07:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19942 invoked by uid 61); 2 Jan 2003 23:07:38 -0000 Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 23:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030102230738.19941.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: 128993@bugs.debian.org, asd@suespammers.org, bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, 128993@bugs.debian.org, asd@suespammers.org, bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/9073: Can __STL_ASSERTIONS come back, but with more than rope? X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00160.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Can __STL_ASSERTIONS come back, but with more than rope? Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->bkoz Responsible-Changed-By: bkoz Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Jan 2 15:07:37 2003 Responsible-Changed-Why: Mine. State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bkoz State-Changed-When: Thu Jan 2 15:07:37 2003 State-Changed-Why: __STL_ASSERTIONS making a comeback is extremely unlikely. A better way to do this would be to just encapsulate std::vector and add your own runtime checks. I believe that Cay Horstman has done this with older versions of std::vector: you might check google. -benjamin http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9073