From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4097 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2003 10:29:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4077 invoked by uid 61); 3 Jan 2003 10:29:43 -0000 Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 10:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030103102943.4076.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu, mark@codesourcery.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de Reply-To: ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu, mark@codesourcery.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/9138: New C++ parser regression on mips-irix6 with g++.jason/thunk1.C (and thunk2.C/thunk3.C) X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00179.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: New C++ parser regression on mips-irix6 with g++.jason/thunk1.C (and thunk2.C/thunk3.C) State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: cae State-Changed-When: Fri Jan 3 02:29:42 2003 State-Changed-Why: This discussion about this PR has been picked up by GNATS as new PRs: PR 9145 and PR 9148. This discussion indicates that this PR is fixed. Is this true? http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9138