From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20303 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2003 10:56:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20287 invoked by uid 71); 3 Jan 2003 10:56:02 -0000 Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 10:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030103105602.20286.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Christian Ehrhardt" Subject: Re: c/9110: Zero-length bitfields cause wider structure when -fpack-struct is specified Reply-To: "Christian Ehrhardt" X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00187.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/9110; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Christian Ehrhardt" To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, etiotto@ca.ibm.com Cc: Subject: Re: c/9110: Zero-length bitfields cause wider structure when -fpack-struct is specified Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 11:46:46 +0100 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9110 Some discussion about this PR got picked up by GNATS as PR 9141 and PR 9142. The executive summary is: a) Mark probably fixed this but someone has to verify on power-pc or build a cross compiler. b) The code snipped in the test case is is wrong, field a should habe type char.