From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17319 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2003 12:16:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17277 invoked by uid 71); 3 Jan 2003 12:16:07 -0000 Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 12:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030103121607.17276.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Neil Booth Subject: Re: c++/3869: Segmentation fault on specialized outer template with inner member template. Reply-To: Neil Booth X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00193.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/3869; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Neil Booth To: Paolo Carlini Cc: jhl@sssonline.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, fluxsmith@fluxsmith.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/3869: Segmentation fault on specialized outer template with inner member template. Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 12:14:11 +0000 Paolo Carlini wrote:- > >>It is compiled just fine with 3.2, 3.3 and mainline. > >> > >>It seems to me that the PR can be closed. > >>Paolo. > >> > >> > >If so, please add a testcase. > > > Well, if my analysis is correct, which one? I mean, the legal-ized > version is compiled > just fine by 3.2.1, 3.3 and 3.4, the illegal one doesn't ICE with 3.4 > but, good, is not compiled > either (see above). So, perhaps just closing it would be fine? Sorry, you're right; if 3.3 compiles it there is no need to add a testcase (it's not due to the new parser). Neil.