Re: c/9166: [2003-01-03] C front end's type scoping not right

[Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>]

The following reply was made to PR c/9166; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: neil@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/9166: [2003-01-03] C front end's type scoping not right
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 13:27:10 +0000

 Joseph S. Myers wrote:-
 
 > What makes you think the former prototype is visible at the latter?  The
 > former declaration has block scope; as the Rationale discusses, there is a
 > delibrate compromise in the standard here, where a former block scope
 > external declaration can be considered, but need not be.  Incompatible
 > declarations need only be diagnosed in the same scope (by 6.7#4).  
 > Declarations refering to the same object or function that are not in the
 > same scope merely yield undefined behavior if of incompatible types
 > (6.2.7#2).
 
 Fair enough.  Obviously I'd never considered the former declaration
 visible, it clearly isn't.  I'd just not read the consequences of
 incompatible declarations closely enough.
 
 I think a pedwarn would be nice, though I suspect it's hard with GCC's
 current code.
 
 At least the behaviour is better than EDG and LCC, which always reject the
 second declaration as incompatible even when it's identical.
 
 Neil.