From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7367 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2003 19:20:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7348 invoked by uid 61); 6 Jan 2003 19:20:12 -0000 Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 19:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030106192012.7347.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, martin@loewis.home.cs.tu-berlin.de, nathan@gcc.gnu.org, snyder@fnal.gov From: nathan@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: nathan@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, martin@loewis.home.cs.tu-berlin.de, nathan@gcc.gnu.org, snyder@fnal.gov, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/100: [parser] confusing name lookup diagnostic X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00355.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: [parser] confusing name lookup diagnostic State-Changed-From-To: suspended->analyzed State-Changed-By: nathan State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 6 11:20:10 2003 State-Changed-Why: It is still wrong. Either the code is well formed, because they are the same entity, or the diagnostic is misleading. Must consult std to determine legality. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=100