From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13151 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2003 22:40:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13125 invoked by uid 61); 6 Jan 2003 22:40:44 -0000 Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 22:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030106224044.13124.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: chris@pennasoft.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, chris@pennasoft.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/9061: Improper access granted to protected typedef from nested member of derived class X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00375.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Improper access granted to protected typedef from nested member of derived class State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 6 14:40:44 2003 State-Changed-Why: The standard was clarified and now states that member classes have all the same rights as member functions of a class. This rule applies here. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9061