From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19958 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2003 14:16:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19930 invoked by uid 71); 7 Jan 2003 14:16:04 -0000 Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 14:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030107141604.19929.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Christian Ehrhardt" Subject: Re: c/9163: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in genrtl_compound_stmt at c-semantics.c:776 with c99 mode Reply-To: "Christian Ehrhardt" X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00440.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/9163; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Christian Ehrhardt" To: Eric Botcazou Cc: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/9163: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE in genrtl_compound_stmt at c-semantics.c:776 with c99 mode Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 15:11:34 +0100 On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 12:41:17PM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote: > I'm very skeptical, because the only change between 20021213 and 20021218 was: > [ ... ] > The ICE is triggered by: > > #ifdef ENABLE_CHECKING > /* Make sure that we've pushed and popped the same number of levels. */ > if (!COMPOUND_STMT_NO_SCOPE (t) && n != current_nesting_level ()) > abort (); > #endif > > that is, the parse error is confusing the regular handling of nested scopes. > > So I think that the problem has been there for a long time, and that > Wolfgang's 20021213 version was configured with --disable-checking. Agreed. So this might not even be a regression at all because tree checking was disabled on all the versions where it worked for me. Thanks for pointing this out. regards Christian -- THAT'S ALL FOLKS!