From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9108 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2003 02:13:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9069 invoked by uid 61); 8 Jan 2003 02:13:29 -0000 Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 02:13:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030108021329.9067.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: aloeff@de.ibm.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, aloeff@de.ibm.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/7577: GCC 3.1 has problems with -gdwarf+ option linking the linux kernel X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00512.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: GCC 3.1 has problems with -gdwarf+ option linking the linux kernel State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Tue Jan 7 18:13:28 2003 State-Changed-Why: Thanks for your report (how unfortunate nobody has yet looked at it). In trying to reproduce it, I saw that the file still had an #include in it. Would you mind running the testcase through the compiler again, and give it -save-temps in addition? This would generate a file called bla.i which we need (it's then self-contained). Thanks Wolfgang http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7577