From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-27484-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22721 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2003 06:46:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22700 invoked by uid 71); 8 Jan 2003 06:46:03 -0000
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 06:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030108064603.22699.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
Subject: Re: c/9100: [3.3/3.4 regression] illegal binary constant causes gcc to seg fault
Reply-To: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00523.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/9100; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.co.uk>
To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
	nobody@gcc.gnu.org, sander_pool@pobox.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/9100: [3.3/3.4 regression] illegal binary constant causes gcc to seg fault
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 06:39:28 +0000

 bangerth@dealii.org wrote:-
 
 > Old Synopsis: illegal binary constant causes gcc to seg fault
 > New Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] illegal binary constant causes gcc to seg fault
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
 > State-Changed-By: bangerth
 > State-Changed-When: Tue Jan  7 17:19:50 2003
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     A minimal testcase is this (just this one line):
 >     -------------------------
 >     int i = (0b11111000 == 0);
 >     -------------------------
 >     It crashes both the C and C++ front ends with a SegFault.
 
 I'd guess this is an unchecked for "error_mark_node" (death to them), and
 quite easy to fix.
 
 Neil.