From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gnatsid@sources.redhat.com>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Received: (qmail 18528 invoked by uid 71); 10 Jan 2003 18:06:03 -0000
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 18:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030110180603.18522.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: c++/9264
Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00652.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/9264; it has been noted by GNATS.

>>From bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu  Mon Jan 13 00:50:24 2003
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Volker Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
Subject: Re: c++/9264
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:59:03 -0600 (CST)

 Forgot to write this: it seems as if this might be related to PR 9100, 
 which has another problem with further processing an invalid number.
 
 W.
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wolfgang Bangerth             email:            bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
                               www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/