From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Received: (qmail 27725 invoked by uid 71); 11 Jan 2003 01:36:03 -0000 Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 01:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030111013603.27723.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Derrick Bass Subject: Re: target/4244: Explicit template instantiation in library files broken Reply-To: Derrick Bass X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00691.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/4244; it has been noted by GNATS. >>From derrick@caltech.edu Mon Jan 13 00:55:31 2003 From: Derrick Bass To: bangerth@dealii.org, derrick@caltech.edu, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: target/4244: Explicit template instantiation in library files broken Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 17:34:30 -0800 It appears that you are right. On Mac OS X 10.2.3 this appears to be fixed. gcc -v gives Reading specs from /usr/libexec/gcc/darwin/ppc/3.1/specs Thread model: posix Apple Computer, Inc. GCC version 1161, based on gcc version 3.1 20020420 (prerelease) Derrick Begin forwarded message: > From: bangerth@dealii.org > Date: Fri Jan 10, 2003 4:42:31 PM America/Los_Angeles > To: derrick@caltech.edu, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, > nobody@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: target/4244: Explicit template instantiation in library > files broken > Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, derrick@caltech.edu, > gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, > gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org > > Synopsis: Explicit template instantiation in library files broken > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: bangerth > State-Changed-When: Fri Jan 10 16:42:31 2003 > State-Changed-Why: > It was indicated to me when I had the same problem that this > does not exist any more when OS X is updated to 10.2. It > was thus a bad interplay between gcc2.95 and the systems's > binutils. Do you have any possibility to check whether this > behavior still exists with either a newer compiler or an > updated system? > > Thanks > Wolfgang > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- > trail&database=gcc&pr=4244 >