From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Received: (qmail 18372 invoked by uid 61); 12 Jan 2003 23:52:22 -0000 Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 23:52:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030112235222.18371.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: dave@boost-consulting.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, dave@boost-consulting.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/9278: dependent type in conversion operator bug X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00771.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: dependent type in conversion operator bug State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 12 15:52:22 2003 State-Changed-Why: Confirmed. I have no clue what the standard says, but an indication that gcc is actually wrong may be given by the fact that the code actually compiles when struct voidify is having its template removed. W. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9278