From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27966 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2003 18:38:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27943 invoked by uid 61); 13 Jan 2003 18:38:15 -0000 Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 18:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030113183815.27942.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, pinskia@physics.uc.edu From: reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de Reply-To: reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, pinskia@physics.uc.edu, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/9287: [parser] [3.4 regression] g++ rejects static member in-class initialization of type `const char* const' X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00828.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: [parser] [3.4 regression] g++ rejects static member in-class initialization of type `const char* const' State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: reichelt State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 13 10:38:14 2003 State-Changed-Why: Not a bug. In-class initialization of static data members is only allowed for integral types - and not character arrays. Yes, previous versions of gcc were less picky. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9287