From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16605 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2003 18:46:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16577 invoked by uid 71); 14 Jan 2003 18:46:03 -0000 Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030114184603.16576.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Mark Mitchell Subject: Re: libstdc++/9269: libstdc++ headers: explicit specialization of function must precede its first use Reply-To: Mark Mitchell X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00886.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/9269; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Mitchell To: "bkoz@gcc.gnu.org" , "Vyatcheslav.Sysoltsev@intel.com" , "bkoz@redhat.com" , "gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org" , "gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org" , "nobody@gcc.gnu.org" , "gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org" Cc: Subject: Re: libstdc++/9269: libstdc++ headers: explicit specialization of function must precede its first use Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 10:36:44 -0800 --On Monday, January 13, 2003 05:41:38 PM +0000 "bkoz@gcc.gnu.org" wrote: > Mark this patch is in 3_2, and 3_3 branch, but cannot be applied to > gcc head, as it gives a compilation failure (new parser likely.). Can you > take a look at it? Yes; will do. -- Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com