From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-27854-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16668 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2003 22:54:51 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16649 invoked by uid 61); 14 Jan 2003 22:54:50 -0000
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 22:54:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030114225450.16648.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mtsirkin@iil.intel.com,
  nobody@gcc.gnu.org
From: bangerth@dealii.org
Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
  mtsirkin@iil.intel.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: other/326: -L path has lower priority than built-in path
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00893.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Synopsis: -L path has lower priority than built-in path

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Tue Jan 14 14:54:50 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    Hi,
    there have been many changes in the area of path handling,
    in particular with the switch from static to shared 
    libraries, since 2.95. Do you know whether this old
    problem still applies with newer versions of gcc?
    
    Thanks
      Wolfgang

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=326