From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3475 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2003 11:16:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3456 invoked by uid 71); 15 Jan 2003 11:16:02 -0000 Resent-Date: 15 Jan 2003 11:16:02 -0000 Resent-Message-ID: <20030115111602.3455.qmail@sources.redhat.com> Resent-From: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Resent-Reply-To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, rassahah@neofonie.de Received: (qmail 2975 invoked by uid 61); 15 Jan 2003 11:12:52 -0000 Message-Id: <20030115111252.2974.qmail@sources.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:16:00 -0000 From: rassahah@neofonie.de Reply-To: rassahah@neofonie.de To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org X-Send-Pr-Version: gnatsweb-2.9.3 (1.1.1.1.2.31) Subject: optimization/9324: gcc-3.4 segfaults combination of O2/functionptr/return val/argument/inline X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00938.txt.bz2 List-Id: >Number: 9324 >Category: optimization >Synopsis: gcc-3.4 segfaults combination of O2/functionptr/return val/argument/inline >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: unassigned >State: open >Class: ice-on-legal-code >Submitter-Id: net >Arrival-Date: Wed Jan 15 03:16:01 PST 2003 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Rasmus Hahn >Release: gcc-3.4 cvs >Organization: >Environment: Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4/specs Configured with: : (reconfigured) : (reconfigured) Thread model: posix gcc version 3.4 20030115 (experimental) >Description: gcc-3.4 segfaults on how-to-repeat-program. compiler-3.4-failureb.c: In function `callfunc': compiler-3.4-failureb.c:11: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report,... The bug occurs also if - the function pointer is embedded in a structure - values have some useful values. This scenario comes from linux-kernel 2.4.19-pre8, kernel/signal.c where the function names are/were different. It does not crash if - the parameter of callfunc is removed, though not used - no inline is used - callfunc does not return a value This bug is new in gcc-3.4, maybe has something to do with PR9298, maybe not >How-To-Repeat: typedef void (*func)(); inline func getfunc() { return (func) 3; } int callfunc(int foo) /* works without parameter */ { getfunc () (); return 0; /* works without return */ } >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: