From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7291 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2003 11:26:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7261 invoked by uid 71); 15 Jan 2003 11:26:04 -0000 Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 11:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030115112604.7260.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Rainer Orth Subject: Re: libstdc++/6553: 26_numerics/complex_inserters_extractors.cc fails in Tru64 UNIX V5.1 Reply-To: Rainer Orth X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00939.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/6553; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Rainer Orth To: bangerth@dealii.org, bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: libstdc++/6553: 26_numerics/complex_inserters_extractors.cc fails in Tru64 UNIX V5.1 Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:16:57 +0100 (MET) bangerth@dealii.org writes: > Synopsis: 26_numerics/complex_inserters_extractors.cc fails in Tru64 UNIX V5.1 > > State-Changed-From-To: feedback->open > State-Changed-By: bangerth > State-Changed-When: Tue Jan 14 14:59:10 2003 > State-Changed-Why: > Feedback provided a long time ago. I think the libstdc++ > people would need to go over this again... This bug has already been fixed for the 3.2 branch and up by this patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-08/msg00229.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-09/msg00366.html Rainer