From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12228 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2003 11:58:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12189 invoked by uid 61); 16 Jan 2003 11:58:12 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030116115812.12188.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: amnon_cohen@yahoo.com, ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org, amnon_cohen@yahoo.com, ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/9319: slower code generated for simple loop on linux X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01001.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: slower code generated for simple loop on linux Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->ebotcazou Responsible-Changed-By: ebotcazou Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Jan 16 03:58:11 2003 Responsible-Changed-Why: Investigating. State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: ebotcazou State-Changed-When: Thu Jan 16 03:58:11 2003 State-Changed-Why: Could you provide us with more details ? What does gcc -v output for each compiler ? Could you post the assembly code generated for the loop by each compiler (gcc -O3 -S) ? On what hardware did you experience the performance hit ? http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9319