public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amnon Cohen <amnon_cohen@yahoo.com> To: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, Subject: Re: optimization/9319: slower code generated for simple loop on linux Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 13:36:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20030116133605.23277.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) The following reply was made to PR optimization/9319; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Amnon Cohen <amnon_cohen@yahoo.com> To: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: amnon@verisity.com Subject: Re: optimization/9319: slower code generated for simple loop on linux Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 05:30:27 -0800 (PST) --0-462841879-1042723827=:65194 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Id: Content-Disposition: inline Hi ebotcazou, Thanks for getting back to me so fast. I have done a few more tests, and it seems that this is a regression on all platforms (not just intel) introduced by gcc3.1 Note that the while loop in the example is equivalent to for (i=0; i<n; i++) s+=i; The for loop generates faster code. Another problem, if we compile with -funroll-all-loops, the loop does not get unrolled on gcc3.2.1, whereas it does on gcc3.0 Here is the information you asked for. For the newer compiler which shows the regression >gcc321 -v Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.2.1/specs Configured with: ./configure Thread model: posix gcc version 3.2.1 Wheras the old version >gcc3 -v Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.0.3/specs Configured with: ./configure Thread model: single gcc version 3.0.3 I have attached the assembler files (produced by gcc -S loop3.c) The performance is significantly reduced on intel linux and on Solaris (I have not sent solaris asm files, let me know if you need them). So I do not think that this is architecture related Please let me know if you need any more info! - Amnon --- ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org wrote: > Synopsis: slower code generated for simple loop on > linux > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->ebotcazou > Responsible-Changed-By: ebotcazou > Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Jan 16 03:58:11 2003 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > Investigating. > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: ebotcazou > State-Changed-When: Thu Jan 16 03:58:11 2003 > State-Changed-Why: > Could you provide us with more details ? What > does gcc -v output for each compiler ? Could you > post the assembly code generated for the loop by > each compiler (gcc -O3 -S) ? On what hardware did > you experience the performance hit ? > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9319 __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com --0-462841879-1042723827=:65194 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="loop3.linux.gcc3.s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: loop3.linux.gcc3.s Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="loop3.linux.gcc3.s" CS5maWxlCSJsb29wMy5jIgoJLnRleHQKCS5hbGlnbiAxNgouZ2xvYmwgbG9v cDMKCS50eXBlCWxvb3AzLEBmdW5jdGlvbgpsb29wMzoKCXB1c2hsCSVlYnAK CXhvcmwJJWVheCwgJWVheAoJbW92bAklZXNwLCAlZWJwCgltb3ZsCTgoJWVi cCksICVlY3gKCXhvcmwJJWVkeCwgJWVkeAoJY21wbAklZWN4LCAlZWF4Cglq Z2UJLkw4CgkucDJhbGlnbiA0Ci5MNToKCWFkZGwJJWVkeCwgJWVheAoJaW5j bAklZWR4CgljbXBsCSVlY3gsICVlZHgKCWpsCS5MNQouTDg6Cglwb3BsCSVl YnAKCXJldAouTGZlMToKCS5zaXplCWxvb3AzLC5MZmUxLWxvb3AzCgkuaWRl bnQJIkdDQzogKEdOVSkgMy4wLjMiCg== --0-462841879-1042723827=:65194 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="loop3.linux.gcc321.s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: loop3.linux.gcc321.s Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="loop3.linux.gcc321.s" CS5maWxlCSJsb29wMy5jIgoJLnRleHQKCS5wMmFsaWduIDQsLDE1Ci5nbG9i bCBsb29wMwoJLnR5cGUJbG9vcDMsQGZ1bmN0aW9uCmxvb3AzOgoJcHVzaGwJ JWVicAoJeG9ybAklZWR4LCAlZWR4Cgltb3ZsCSVlc3AsICVlYnAKCW1vdmwJ OCglZWJwKSwgJWVjeAoJeG9ybAklZWF4LCAlZWF4CgkucDJhbGlnbiA0LCwx NQouTDc6CgljbXBsCSVlY3gsICVlZHgKCWpnZQkuTDMKCWFkZGwJJWVkeCwg JWVheAoJaW5jbAklZWR4CglqbXAJLkw3Ci5MMzoKCXBvcGwJJWVicAoJcmV0 Ci5MZmUxOgoJLnNpemUJbG9vcDMsLkxmZTEtbG9vcDMKCS5pZGVudAkiR0ND OiAoR05VKSAzLjIuMSIK --0-462841879-1042723827=:65194--
next reply other threads:[~2003-01-16 13:36 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-01-16 13:36 Amnon Cohen [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2003-04-16 7:09 ebotcazou 2003-01-22 2:06 Richard Henderson 2003-01-21 23:16 Eric Botcazou 2003-01-17 9:35 ebotcazou 2003-01-17 3:36 Richard Henderson 2003-01-16 19:16 Eric Botcazou 2003-01-16 11:58 ebotcazou 2003-01-15 10:16 amnon_cohen
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20030116133605.23277.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=amnon_cohen@yahoo.com \ --cc=ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).