From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-27983-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31189 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2003 22:16:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31167 invoked by uid 71); 16 Jan 2003 22:16:03 -0000
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030116221603.31166.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Subject: Re: c++/9345: Erroneous access controls in friend function parameter initializer
Reply-To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01022.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/9345; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
To: llewins@raytheon.com
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/9345: Erroneous access controls in friend function parameter initializer
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:09:39 -0800

 This is fixed at least in gcc version 3.4 20030115 (experimental).
 
 Thanks,
 Andrew Pinski