public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Ludwig <cludwig@cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
Subject: Re: c++/7522: access by friend function's default argument
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:46:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030117084605.14628.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)

The following reply was made to PR c++/7522; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Christoph Ludwig <cludwig@cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>
To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
	nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/7522: access by friend function's default argument
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 09:37:57 +0100

 Hi,
 
 On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 05:24:55PM -0000, bangerth@dealii.org wrote:
 > Synopsis: access by friend function's default argument
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: feedback->analyzed
 > State-Changed-By: bangerth
 > State-Changed-When: Thu Oct 31 09:24:55 2002
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     One way or other, the example Christoph gave shows a bug,
 >     since treatment is not consistent. So I reset the state
 >     to "analyzed".
 >     
 >     And no, I don't know what is right and wrong here, sorry.
 
 A post by John Spicer to comp.std.c++ (Thread: "Req Clarification:
 private type used in parameter list of friend function") pointed me to
 11.0.5 in the standard. There is an example that settles the question,
 I think:
 
   class A {
     typedef int I; // private member
     I f();
     friend I g(I);
     static I x;
   }; 
 
   A::I A::f() { return 0; } 
   A::I g(A::I p = A::x); 
 
 gcc 3.2.1 rejects the default argument in the last line, but according
 to the standard the example is well formed.
 
 Regards
 
 Christoph
 
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7522
 
 


             reply	other threads:[~2003-01-17  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-17  8:46 Christoph Ludwig [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-28 16:58 bangerth
2002-10-31  9:24 bangerth
2002-10-31  8:46 Christoph Ludwig
2002-10-30 15:32 bangerth
2002-08-07  8:46 Christoph Ludwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030117084605.14628.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=cludwig@cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de \
    --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).