From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6245 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2003 05:23:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6195 invoked by uid 48); 20 Jan 2003 05:23:22 -0000 Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 05:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030120052322.6194.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: comer@mailru.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: neroden@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: neroden@gcc.gnu.org, comer@mailru.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/6273: ICE in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:3471, also an error with gcc 2.95.3 X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01105.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: ICE in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:3471, also an error with gcc 2.95.3 State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->open State-Changed-By: neroden State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 20 05:23:22 2003 State-Changed-Why: No longer ICEs; may not be a bug at all, waiting for feedback from people who understand the intricacies of the C++ standard regarding operator overloading and anonymous enums. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6273