From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-28115-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 32001 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2003 17:26:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31961 invoked by uid 71); 21 Jan 2003 17:26:01 -0000
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 17:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030121172600.31960.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Volker Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
Subject: Re: c++/9373: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE with -fstrict-aliasing in set_mem_alias_set, at emit-rtl.c:1932
Reply-To: Volker Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01154.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/9373; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Volker Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, adam@os.inf.tu-dresden.de
Cc: ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de
Subject: Re: c++/9373: [3.3/3.4 regression] ICE with -fstrict-aliasing in set_mem_alias_set, at emit-rtl.c:1932
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 19:25:56 +0100

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9373
 
 The reduced testcase looks legal to me.
 The compiler seems to have trouble to identify "Mword" and "unsigned".
 If I only use one of those inside the struct, everything compiles fine.
 
 Regards,
 Volker