From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28949 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2003 20:46:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28923 invoked by uid 71); 22 Jan 2003 20:46:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 20:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030122204601.28914.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Wolfgang Bangerth Subject: Re: c++/5543: Conversions and template functions Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01239.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/5543; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Wolfgang Bangerth To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, Cc: Subject: Re: c++/5543: Conversions and template functions Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 14:44:27 -0600 (CST) This is a simpler testcase: -------------------- template struct type {}; template void foo (type); template struct C { operator T(); }; int main () { C > c; foo (c); } -------------------------- gcc fails, because it can't find an instance of foo(C >). It could, however, if it tried to apply the conversion operator of C first, but I don't know whether it is required to do so. I suspect not, since it also fails for icc7. W. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/