From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29899 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2003 21:44:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29877 invoked by uid 48); 22 Jan 2003 21:44:35 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 21:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030122214435.29874.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/9407: [3.4 regression] Parser bug X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01254.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: [3.4 regression] Parser bug State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Wed Jan 22 21:44:35 2003 State-Changed-Why: You need to write typename Foo::Bar(1); (note the "typename"). Also, there is no need to ping gcc@gcc.gnu.org for each bug you find. The people who can fix bugs, and the people like me who filter them, are quite comfortable with reading gcc-bugs (where new reports are automatically posted), and with searching the database. -Wolfgang http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9407