From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-28233-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27932 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2003 22:36:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27920 invoked by uid 71); 22 Jan 2003 22:36:01 -0000
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 22:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030122223601.27919.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: optimization/9279: 3.2 regression to 2.95 / 3.0.4 on sparc-linux
Reply-To: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01272.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/9279; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
To: ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org, frank@g-n-u.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
        gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/9279: 3.2 regression to 2.95 / 3.0.4 on sparc-linux
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 23:23:50 +0100

 ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org writes:
 >     Could you precise what the self-contained testcase ouputs when compiled with the different versions of gcc ?
 
 the simplified (second) example:
 
 $ gcc-2.95 -O2 fbug2.c && ./a.out
 0
 
 $ gcc-3.0 -O2 fbug2.c && ./a.out
 0
 
 $ gcc-3.2 -O2 fbug2.c && ./a.out
 2
 
 $ gcc-3.2 -O1 fbug2.c && ./a.out
 0