From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32199 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2003 03:01:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32177 invoked by uid 48); 23 Jan 2003 03:01:32 -0000 Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 03:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030123030132.32176.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: daniel.frey@aixigo.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, daniel.frey@aixigo.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/7065: unnamed derived classes/structs are rejected X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01315.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: unnamed derived classes/structs are rejected State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Thu Jan 23 03:01:31 2003 State-Changed-Why: Fixed with new parser. The only valid use of an unnamed struct is to either declare a typedef, or to name a variable: ------------------------ class A {}; typedef class : A {} B; class : A {} a; ------------------ Both uses compile just fine now. That being said, what an abomination of the language! W. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=7065