From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-28281-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5372 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2003 03:16:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5357 invoked by uid 71); 23 Jan 2003 03:16:00 -0000
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 03:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030123031600.5356.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: c++/7129
Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01320.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/7129; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/7129
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 21:07:23 -0600 (CST)

 This used to just give an error in 2.95, but ICEs ever since, so it's a 
 regression.
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wolfgang Bangerth             email:            bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
                               www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/