From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14992 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2003 03:46:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14978 invoked by uid 71); 23 Jan 2003 03:46:00 -0000 Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 03:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030123034600.14977.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Nathanael Nerode Subject: Re: c++/6749: ... Reply-To: Nathanael Nerode X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01326.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/6749; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nathanael Nerode To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, rullo.pat@tiscalinet.it, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: c++/6749: ... Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 22:40:53 -0500 I've cut the testcase down to the following: template class inner { public: inner() { } }; template class parent { public: virtual parent >* f() ; }; template class child: public parent { public: parent >* f() { return new child >; } }; int main() { parent x ; child y ; return 0; } I'm having trouble with my GCC build, so I haven't tested it on a current version yet.