From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-28295-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17874 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2003 05:26:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17860 invoked by uid 71); 23 Jan 2003 05:26:00 -0000
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 05:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030123052600.17859.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Mark Mentovai <mark@moxienet.com>
Subject: Re: optimization/9414: Bad code with -mcpu=ultrasparc -O2, stx used where st was needed
Reply-To: Mark Mentovai <mark@moxienet.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01334.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/9414; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Mark Mentovai <mark@moxienet.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/9414: Bad code with -mcpu=ultrasparc -O2, stx used where st was needed
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:18:45 -0500

 This is a regression, the output from 3.0.4 looks clean.  The bug is 
 present in 3.1, 3.1.1, and 3.2.
 
 Mark