public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Philippe A. Bouchard" <philippeb@videotron.ca> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, Subject: Re: c++/7136: Template constants deduction Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 05:36:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20030123053600.20415.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) The following reply was made to PR c++/7136; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Philippe A. Bouchard" <philippeb@videotron.ca> To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, philippeb@videotron.ca, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: c++/7136: Template constants deduction Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 00:29:38 -0500 Yes you're right but the following won't work either under gcc 2.95: struct Type { int i; }; template <typename _T, int _T::* _I> struct Number {}; template <typename _T, int _T::* _I> void foo(Number<_T, _I> const &) { } int main() { foo(Number<Type, & Type::i>()); } Returns: template.cpp: In function `int main()': template.cpp:15: no matching function for call to `foo (Number<Type,&Type::i>)' Philippe ----- Original Message ----- From: <bangerth@dealii.org> To: <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>; <gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>; <nobody@gcc.gnu.org>; <philippeb@videotron.ca> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:16 PM Subject: Re: c++/7136: Template constants deduction > Synopsis: Template constants deduction > > State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed > State-Changed-By: bangerth > State-Changed-When: Thu Jan 23 03:16:59 2003 > State-Changed-Why: > Nathan must have been having his afternoon nap when he > confirmed this report :-) > > The code is actually illegal, and gcc tells you quite > correctly what is wrong: > ----------------------------- > struct Type { int i; }; > > template <typename _T, int _T::*> > struct Number {}; > > template <typename _T, int _T::*> > void foo(Number<_T, int _T::*> const &) > {} > > int main() { > foo(Number<Type, &Type::i>()); > } > ------------------------------ > > In the argument list to foo(), the second template > parameter to Number is "int T::*", which is a type, not > a value. That's what the compiler is complaining about. In > the call to foo(), the second argument is a value, as it > should be. > > W. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p r=7136 >
next reply other threads:[~2003-01-23 5:36 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-01-23 5:36 Philippe A. Bouchard [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2003-01-23 15:06 Wolfgang Bangerth 2003-01-23 3:16 bangerth 2002-07-03 12:45 nathan 2002-06-26 23:06 philippeb
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20030123053600.20415.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=philippeb@videotron.ca \ --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).