From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26844 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2003 16:56:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26799 invoked by uid 71); 24 Jan 2003 16:56:00 -0000 Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 16:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030124165600.26794.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Giovanni Bajo" Subject: Re: c++/8684: ABI Issue: gcc3.2 is not reusing tail-padding.. Reply-To: "Giovanni Bajo" X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01426.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/8684; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Giovanni Bajo" To: , , , , Cc: Subject: Re: c++/8684: ABI Issue: gcc3.2 is not reusing tail-padding.. Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 17:54:49 +0100 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p r=8684 GCC is correct here because C1 is of POD type, and tail padding can be reused only in non-POD types. Comeau agrees, I don't know why ICC does not. Besides, Mark already commented this very code snippet: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-11/msg00474.html IMO, this is not a bug and should be closed. Giovanni Bajo