From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2801 invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2003 01:16:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2787 invoked by uid 71); 25 Jan 2003 01:16:00 -0000 Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 01:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030125011600.2786.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Tom Tromey Subject: Re: java/9170: gcj regression: ICE in walk_tree, at tree-inline.c:1692 Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01452.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR java/9170; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tom Tromey To: jbuck@synopsys.com Cc: green@redhat.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, Andrew Haley Subject: Re: java/9170: gcj regression: ICE in walk_tree, at tree-inline.c:1692 Date: 24 Jan 2003 18:08:23 -0700 Joe> Old Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression?] gcj regression: ICE in walk_tree, at tree-inline.c:1692 Joe> New Synopsis: gcj regression: ICE in walk_tree, at tree-inline.c:1692 I asked Anthony about this the other day. I think he sent the info to Andrew, who is the most likely candidate for fixing the regression. Tom