From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-28415-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9599 invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2003 01:46:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9575 invoked by uid 71); 25 Jan 2003 01:46:00 -0000
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 01:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030125014600.9567.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: c++/8766: [3.2->3.2.2 regression] cc1plus segfaults after failed
 initialisation of static template variable
Reply-To: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01454.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/8766; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, andrew-message@ccl.bham.ac.uk,
   bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/8766: [3.2->3.2.2 regression] cc1plus segfaults after failed
 initialisation of static template variable
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 17:40:40 -0800

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8766
 
 Both test cases (A and B) work with gcc 3.2.0, fail with gcc 3.2.1 and 
 the current
 3_2_branch, and work in 3_3_branch and trunk.