From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13028 invoked by alias); 26 Jan 2003 23:31:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13004 invoked by uid 48); 26 Jan 2003 23:31:19 -0000 Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 23:31:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030126233119.13003.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, paolo@gcc.gnu.org, scmvs@cs.cf.ac.uk, val@digiways.com From: paolo@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: paolo@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, paolo@gcc.gnu.org, scmvs@cs.cf.ac.uk, val@digiways.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/9444: g++ STL requires iterators passed to string constructor to have a constructor without parameters, but C++ standard does not require that X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01488.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: g++ STL requires iterators passed to string constructor to have a constructor without parameters, but C++ standard does not require that Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->paolo Responsible-Changed-By: paolo Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jan 26 23:31:18 2003 Responsible-Changed-Why: Analyzed. State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: paolo State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 26 23:31:18 2003 State-Changed-Why: In a nutshell, I do not agree. Indeed, the lines which you emphasize are from: _S_construct(..., forward_iterator_tag) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Among the ISO C++ requirements for _forward_ iterators (24.1.3, Table 74) is the parameterless constructor. Paolo. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9444