public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, Subject: Re: other/9081: gcc doesn't diagnose, that the compiler exceeds a compiler limit Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 02:46:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20030128024601.6569.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) The following reply was made to PR other/9081; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com> To: 133574@bugs.debian.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, pavel@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz Cc: Subject: Re: other/9081: gcc doesn't diagnose, that the compiler exceeds a compiler limit Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 20:39:29 -0600 We hit this same bug on ppc64 running 32-bit apps with the following testcase (32-bit apps get a full 4G of addr space to live in on ppc64): char x[2000000000]; int main(void) { return 10; } Pavel is correct that all the calls to do_brk fail to test the return status of do_brk. This is only part of the problem. The other major problem is that we don't call set_brk to reserve the bss region for the application until after we've already loaded the loader via the load_elf_interp() call. I have a patch that fixes both of those problems, but got delayed in posting since I was also trying to clean up what looks to be memory leaks in the error paths of load_elf_binary() before getting pulled away on another problem. For example, it would seem the following code should be freeing some of the storage it allocaed before returning. I'll try and clean up my patch and submit it. /* Do this so that we can load the interpreter, if need be. We will change some of these later */ current->mm->rss = 0; retval = setup_arg_pages(bprm); if (retval < 0) { send_sig(SIGKILL, current, 0); return retval; } Peter
next reply other threads:[~2003-01-28 2:46 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-01-28 2:46 Peter Bergner [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2003-01-26 20:06 Pavel Machek 2003-01-26 9:43 rth 2002-12-28 6:06 Matthias Klose
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20030128024601.6569.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=bergner@vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).