From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6936 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2003 15:56:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6918 invoked by uid 71); 28 Jan 2003 15:56:00 -0000 Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 15:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030128155600.6917.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Wolfgang Bangerth Subject: Re: c++/9450 Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01598.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/9450; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Wolfgang Bangerth To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: catherin@ca.ibm.com Subject: Re: c++/9450 Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 09:54:52 -0600 (CST) Another datapoint which I forgot to mention: with -fabi-version=0, gcc generates a different symbol that demangles correctly. However, it still does not match the one by icc7 (which incidentially is equal to the one Catherine proposes in the report). W. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/