From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19937 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2003 09:46:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19923 invoked by uid 71); 29 Jan 2003 09:46:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030129094600.19922.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Giovanni Bajo" Subject: Re: c++/9443: ICE in resolve_scoped_fn_name, at cp/call.c:2604 Reply-To: "Giovanni Bajo" X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01658.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/9443; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Giovanni Bajo" To: , , , , Cc: Subject: Re: c++/9443: ICE in resolve_scoped_fn_name, at cp/call.c:2604 Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:35:10 +0100 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p r=9443 Isn't __attribute__((unused)) meant to be used for functions? The code looks like: template __timepunct<_CharT>::__timepunct(__c_locale int __cloc, const char* __s __attribute__ ((__unused__)), size_t __refs) which confuses G++ 3.2, but at least reporting a correct error. So I don't see any bug with 3.2. Giovanni Bajo