From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-28677-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 11143 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2003 01:56:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 11119 invoked by uid 71); 30 Jan 2003 01:56:01 -0000
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 01:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030130015601.11118.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: libstdc++/9378: 64-bit g++: construct base:std::moneypunct_byname<char>->memory fault
Reply-To: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01716.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/9378; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
To: Martin Sebor <sebor@roguewave.com>
Cc: bkoz@gcc.gnu.org, axiong@ca.ibm.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
	gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/9378: 64-bit g++: construct base:std::moneypunct_byname<char>->memory fault
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 20:53:54 -0600

 On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 18:45:32 -0700
 Martin Sebor <sebor@roguewave.com> wrote:
 
 >In fact, I would even propose that we remove the _byname ctors,
 >or better yet, the entire facets from the standard ;-) (only
 >half joking).
 
 I would support any attempt to remove the _byname disasters from any future
 standard (no joking.)
 
 -benjamin