From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10427 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2003 09:44:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10404 invoked by uid 48); 30 Jan 2003 09:44:56 -0000 Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 09:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030130094456.10403.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, paolo@gcc.gnu.org, scmvs@cs.cf.ac.uk, val@digiways.com From: paolo@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: paolo@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, paolo@gcc.gnu.org, scmvs@cs.cf.ac.uk, val@digiways.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/9444: g++ STL requires iterators passed to string constructor to have a constructor without parameters, but C++ standard does not require that X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01720.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: g++ STL requires iterators passed to string constructor to have a constructor without parameters, but C++ standard does not require that State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed State-Changed-By: paolo State-Changed-When: Thu Jan 30 09:44:55 2003 State-Changed-Why: Ok, by now the issue seems completely clear to me. By the way, in case you really don't want to provide a parameterless constructor just inherit from std::iterator http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9444