From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29173 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2003 16:11:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 29154 invoked by uid 48); 31 Jan 2003 16:11:55 -0000 Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 16:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030131161155.29153.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: davidwu@arcturusnetworks.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rearnsha@gcc.gnu.org, davidwu@arcturusnetworks.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/6265: arm-elf toolchain wrong reference to varibles or stack address when using -O2 option X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg01769.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: arm-elf toolchain wrong reference to varibles or stack address when using -O2 option State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: rearnsha State-Changed-When: Fri Jan 31 16:11:55 2003 State-Changed-Why: I'm unable to see anything wrong with any the compilers I've tried this on (2.95.3 NetBSD/ARM 3.4 NetBSD/ARM, 2.95.4 Debian, 3.4 arm-elf). If think there is still a problem can you provide sample good and bad output that I can use to compare against. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6265