From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21768 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2003 22:32:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21748 invoked by uid 48); 2 Feb 2003 22:32:13 -0000 Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 22:32:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030202223213.21747.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mueller@kde.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: bangerth@dealii.org Reply-To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mueller@kde.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/9537: [3.4 regression] [New parser] problem handling const return types X-SW-Source: 2003-02/txt/msg00060.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: [3.4 regression] [New parser] problem handling const return types State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: bangerth State-Changed-When: Sun Feb 2 22:32:13 2003 State-Changed-Why: Confirmed. I would say the code is legal, and even if not then it is certainly true that the error message absolutely does not make sense at all. W. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9537